View-through vs. Click-through

10 12 2009

View-throughs (VT) are great when discussing with your boss! You can show a kick-ass campaign with a tiny tiny cost per acquisition (CPA). The problem is that it is, that 10 VT sales are not always the same as 10 extra sales. And your boss might notice that after a while (at least if he is smart).

I have always had a problem with the metric view-through. What is this metric exactly describing?

Every time I am looking at my stats from my display ad campaigns I always get a little dizzy when I come to the VT’s. I mean CT’s a quite easy to understand. A user clicked at your banner and converted on your site. Boom – that’s it.

A VT on the other hand is a lot more hard to understand. It could be someone who surfed through a page where your banner was served at the bottom, and the user never actually saw you ad. Nevertheless the user converted 5 days later of other reasons. But the user still has your cookie and will be counted as a VT sale except if he is coming through another marketing campaign such as Adwords.

This problem is even bigger when you ads are served at pages with lots of traffic like the main national boulevard-press website like The Sun or eb.dk here in Denmark. There is a good change that almost all surfers get by at some point and get your cookie placed at their computer.

And that is the time when your boss is paying you a second visit asking you why your other channels suddenly are falling while your great campaign is top performing. The VT’s are simply taking credit for all the natural conversions as well even though the traffic was there before the campaign.

So should I just skip the metric and focus on CT’s? This will cause the problem that the display ad channel will look so gargantuan expensive compared to decisional channels like the search engines. So de facto this is the same as closing down the channel.

Should I just cut the display ad channel then? Actually I tried that for a while already ;-) That gave me a significant lower CPA but unfortunately my SEM-campaigns suddenly got a lot more expensive and the volume in search engines in general fell. Doh!

I have turned on the display campaigns again. I have developed a special excel sheet trying to compensate for all the flaws. I’m measuring my upper-funnel on more parameters that just conversions and all in all trying to compensate. I’m not happy though!

Guys, how are you handling the problem?





The unclicking crowd

7 11 2009

According to a new study only 16% of the online population accounts for almost all banner clicks. Seth Godin has a comment on it here.

That is exactly why we need new ways of accrediting online media channels. A good attribution model most include the 84% not clicking a banner if the banner is still participating in the conversion.





TraceWorks and Attribution Management

4 11 2009

TraceWorks asked in their Dojo which tool we would love to see in Headlight. Which tool can dramatically improve our performance?

My answer is Attribution Management. I would LOVE to see a Danish provider participate in the race for developing the one tool with potential to sweep the table.

Here is my Answer:
Hey! A competition and no winner announced. Great :-)

For quite some time now I have been looking for a good tool to do attribution management. I simply need more information than my media agency can provide me on which campaigns, media channels and medias attributing to $$ and which are not.

We have deployed a “last-click-wins” approach for a long time and the last click is typically a search engine – thanks Google for that approach. Anywho, I need to know more about how the user ended up doing a specific search.  For this we need attribution management where we are moving back in the chain of influencers to do proper attribution of value for a sale.

Such an approach might help us advertisers to spent more money on creative and less tactical solutions. Or at least the bunch of us who wants to do the math before placing our bet :-)

Forrester did a report on the subject in late October (read it here:http://bit.ly/qwplb) It looks like the industry is finally starting to make a move and TraceWorks should definitely follow it.





A.Bach at Emetrics

29 09 2009

In October I’m going to Stockholm to talk at Emetrics . Here I will present a case study on Telia Broadband in Denmark together with Steen Rasmussen from IIH Nordic.

Personally I’m looking forward to go there and meet a bunch of great thinkers within the field of Analytics. The program is jam-packed with interesting speakers amongst others Steve Jackson, Eric T. Peterson, Aurelie Pols and Jim Sterne just to name a few.

One of my biggest interests these days is to get a method to get away from the “last click wins”-model and I hope there will be some perspectives on that topic up there. One thing is for sure. Last Click Wins won’t last!





No Cure No Pay

11 06 2008

Når talen falder på jobportaler og jobformidlingsservices, er en af de største kritikpunkter ofte, at man ikke har den fjernest idé om hvorvidt man får noget for sine penge, når man indrykker annoncer. I et marked med lav arbejdsløshed som vi har i Danmark for tiden, er de eneste som er sikre på en god forretning, jobportalerne.

Fair nok, tænkte vi i SpotAJob - good point. Vi har alligevel i SpotAJob længe gået og haft lyst til at tilbyde et rent no cure no pay-produkt.

Det er derfor en glæde nu at kunne tilbyde alle virksomheder gratis jobopslag på www.spotajob.dk! En virksomhed skal kun betale SpotAJob provision, hvis virksomheden finder en ny medarbejder gennem vores dusørjæger-netværk.

Sådan; ikke mere brok - Spred endelig budskabet :-)

Læs mere om SpotAJobs priser på dusørrekruttering her

Anders





What’s next?

12 03 2008

Penelope Trunk, som til dagligt skriver klummer for bl.a. Boston Globe har forfatte en fin artikle “New ways to get great candidates”.

Her findes bl.a. fine råd til hvordan kommunikationsafdelingen kan bruges på en spidsfindig måde!

/Anders





SpotAJob i nyt samarbejde med JobSelect

29 02 2008

Som led i vores bestræbelser på at skaffe mest mulig eksponering af vores kunders jobs og dusører, har SpotAJob indgået et samarbejde med en af Danmarks største traditionelle jobportaler.

JobSelect er en ”no bull”-jobportal, som arbejder på at gøre jobsøgningsproceduren lettere for alle de aktive jobsøgende. Her kan du oprette et CV eller søge blandt portalens mere en 4.000 jobs.

Vi glæder os til at byde JobSelects brugere velkommen i kampen om alle de mange dusører!

/Anders





Sølvsteen går i kødet på traditionelle jobannoncer

28 02 2008

Computer World bragte artikelen med overskriften”Stillings-annoncer er bare så dødkedelige“. Claus Sølvsteen er, foruden at være partner i Peytz & Co, ivrig kommentator og mangeårige iagttager af WWW.

SpotAJob stemmer i med et højlydt “Hørt!”.

/Anders





Tillykke med de 50 Lego!!

28 01 2008

I dag kl. 13.58 er det præcis 50 år siden Godtfred Kirk Christiansen afleverede patentansøgning til lego klodsen.

Det fejres over hele kloden. Google har tidligere vist, at de var pjattede med Lego, og har i dagens anledning kommet et Google-logo bygget i Lego på forsiden af søgemaskinen:

Lego turns 50

og her er en tidligere hyldest:

Lego Google 

Sikke en idé – Stort tillykke!

/Anders





Får du penge for at gå til jobsamtaler?

24 01 2008

Hvis du gør, er du helt klart i superligaen – eller på dagpenge – eller begge dele :-)

Den amerikansk iværksættervirksomhed NotchUp har lavet en service, som sytematiserer ‘betaling-for-en-jobsamtale’-princippet. Siden er stadig i beta, og man skal inviteres for at få adgang, men den skulle efter sigende være let at bruge for folk med en LinkedIn-profil. NotchUp importerer din LinkedIn-profil og så sætter du et beløb, for hvor meget du vil have for at dukke op til en samtale. Vupti, så er det bare at læne sig tilbage og blive rig på invitationer … i teorien i det mindste.

Kampen om de passive kandidater spidser til. Men er det her løsningen?

En ting er helt sikkert … der er helt klart en ny karrierevej åbne her! Man kan jo leve af at gå til jobsamtaler. Eller i alt fald have et rigtig godt bi-job.

Hvem vil mon synes det her er the shit? Og hvordan mon de lukker for de åbenlyse problemer med, at folk kan have fake-job-titler på deres profiler bare for at blive kaldt til samtale osv.

/Anders